Oldest rocks on earth radiometric dating
This gains traction from Hebrews 4:3-7, which states, If, therefore, it may be considered legitimate to take the seventh day as representative of a much longer period of time, then whence the mandate for supposing a commitment to interpreting the other six days as representative of 24-hour periods?
it may be noticed that days 1-3 form a triad that corresponds to the triad formed by days 4-6.
In this article, I attempt to show that, while it is possible to interpret the book of Genesis in light of a young earth, there is no Biblical mandate for this conclusion: That is to say, Genesis .
I am trained as a scientist (I’m a postgraduate student in evolutionary biology).
Furthermore, in the outer courtyard of the temple were representations of various aspects of cosmic geography.Having shown that Genesis does not that one read it as conveying a young earth, I hope that readers will be convinced that we can thus read and understand the science on its own terms as well.It seems to me that there are three major subtopics which an article of this nature must address.This on its own may suggest that the duration of this day was significantly longer than 24 hours!Further notice that Genesis 2:8 says, many features of Genesis 1 bear a striking similarity to texts concerned with the temple, a phenomenon which has given rise to various understandings of Genesis 1 as a description of the “cosmic temple.” For one thing, there is the curious fact that the number seven appears so pervasively in temple accounts in the ancient world and in the Bible.